Re: CL package suggestion

[Ilya Shlyakhter]

Agree about cl- being better than ecl- .

Btw, if remove-if becomes defalias'ed to cl-remove-if, aren't the two calls indistinguishable
to the byte compiler?   If they are, and calling cl-remove wouldn't trigger a warning, 
wouldn't remove-if calls also become warning-less?   And if they would, isn't it simpler
to just allow calling remove-if? :)

ilya

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:

> I'm just glad this is being considered :)  It'd be great to see this in
> 24.2 .

Patch welcome (and BTW, I'd prefer the "cl-" prefix over the "ecl-" prefix).
It's never too early to start.


       Stefan