|
From: | Richard H Lee |
Subject: | Re: ASCII encryption |
Date: | Mon, 16 Apr 2012 17:31:35 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1 |
On 16/04/12 15:18, Jambunathan K wrote:
If `epa-armor' is not supported it should be removed or be made in to a defconst. Or it could be crptically renamed so that people don't discover it accidentally. The info manual can be augmented to mention why the author thinks using it globally is not a good idea. epa-armor is like the biblical forbidden fruit with hints of both pleasure and pain. The ultimate end it achieves is to leave mere mortals in a state of perpetual confusion on private matters.
So I that (setq epa-armor t) in my emacs file is not a good idea?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |