Re: Odd formatting

[Steinar Bang]

>>>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden>:

> Totally off topic, I was looking at how strange your messages are
> rendering and wondering whether the mail reader was interpreting your
> messages incorrectly or something.  But here's the (sort of) raw source
> of that text:

> <div>I agree with you. Fortunately that&#39;s not what I&#39;m arguing. 
> I&#39;m arguing that</div><div>for a very specific corner of the type system, 
> we merge two separate</div>
> <div>meanings of nil. I&#39;m arguing that the empty string as it is used 
> today is,</div><div>for all intents, just another nil. So it should not 
> signal an error if they are</div><div>treated the same.</div>

> (This is the text/html part of the multipart message you send.)

Note that the text/plain version of the message is foramatted exactly
like the bit you quoted.