[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC
From: |
Yann Hodique |
Subject: |
Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC |
Date: |
Wed, 09 May 2012 19:08:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Schulte <address@hidden> writes:
> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> writes:
>> "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> > We don't want to bother with MIME for short snippets.
>>>
>>> Then what do you think your MUA is there for?
>>
>> The support for embedding small snippets via MIME is dicey in some mail
>> readers, last time I looked. They present(ed) the first textual part as
>> the only visible text, and presented the rest as attachments.
> To contribute to the bikeshedding [1], I've composed an example email in
> gnus with inline Org-mode-syntax code, inline mime-annotated code, and
> attached (disposition=inline) code. The results as displayed by gnus,
> gmail and gmx are shown [2]. I don't know if gnus should limit itself
> based on the limitations of non-standards-compliant commercial software,
> but at the least it would seem that while the mime approach /should/ be
> the most portable it will in fact not be portable to many (maybe most)
> other MUAs.
Note that it's the reason why my initial proposal was based on inline
multipart alternative. Providing a MIME fallback that any MUA should
recognize (such as text/plain) should increase vastly the chances of
proper formatting. At least GMail behaves "correctly" when the
text/plain alternative is provided.
Yann.
--
We do what we must. Friendship and loyalty be damned. We do what we must!
-- LADY HELENA ATREIDES,
her personal journals
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, (continued)
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/05/08
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Miles Bader, 2012/05/08
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/05/09
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/05/09
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2012/05/09
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Eric Schulte, 2012/05/09
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC,
Yann Hodique <=
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Eric Schulte, 2012/05/09
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Yann Hodique, 2012/05/09
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Eric Schulte, 2012/05/09
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Yann Hodique, 2012/05/09
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/05/10
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/05/10
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Yann Hodique, 2012/05/10
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/05/10
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Yann Hodique, 2012/05/10
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Miles Bader, 2012/05/10