Re: lexical-binding questions

[Johan Bockgård]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

>>> (setq lexical-binding t)
>>> (let ((nil 0)) nil)  => 0
>
> Anyway, I guess nil and t should be marked as special-variable-p, if for
> no other reason than because they are pretty damn special.

The problem also applies to keyword symbols.

I was thinking

      if (!NILP (lexenv) && SYMBOLP (var)
+         && !SYMBOL_CONSTANT_P (var)
          && !XSYMBOL (var)->declared_special
          && NILP (Fmemq (var, Vinternal_interpreter_environment)))
        /* Lexically bind VAR by adding it to the lexenv alist.  */
        lexenv = Fcons (Fcons (var, tem), lexenv);

in let/let*.