[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ptrdiff_t misuse
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: ptrdiff_t misuse |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Jul 2012 19:00:20 +0300 |
> Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 08:56:04 -0700
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden,
> address@hidden
>
> > What for? they span the same range of values.
>
> Yes, that's the point -- if ptrdiff_t and EMACS_POS
> would span the same range of values, why bother to
> distinguish the two?
Because Emacs positions are not pointers, nor differences between
pointers.
> Whether a value is a buffer position is usually clearly stated in
> the variable name.
I refer you to the recent repeated confusions about this by Dmitry.
- Re: ptrdiff_t misuse, (continued)
- Re: ptrdiff_t misuse, Paul Eggert, 2012/07/07
- Re: ptrdiff_t misuse, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/07/06
- Re: ptrdiff_t misuse, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/07/06
- Re: ptrdiff_t misuse, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/07/06
- Re: ptrdiff_t misuse, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/07/06
- Re: ptrdiff_t misuse, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/07/06
- Re: ptrdiff_t misuse, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/07/06
- Re: ptrdiff_t misuse, Paul Eggert, 2012/07/06
- Re: ptrdiff_t misuse, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/07/06
- Re: ptrdiff_t misuse, Paul Eggert, 2012/07/06
- Re: ptrdiff_t misuse,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: ptrdiff_t misuse, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/07/06
- Re: ptrdiff_t misuse, Paul Eggert, 2012/07/06
- Re: ptrdiff_t misuse, Chong Yidong, 2012/07/06