Re: [RFC] caar/cadr/cdar/cddr

[Tom Tromey]

>>>>> "Dmitry" == Dmitry Antipov <address@hidden> writes:

Dmitry> These are widely used, so why not doing them as C primitives and
Dmitry> corresponding bytecodes?  It shouldn't be too hard to tweak
Dmitry> byte-opt.el to optimize (car (cdr X)) -> (cadr X) etc., and so
Dmitry> emit new bytecodes.

One other thing worth noting -- if we used vmgen, we could get
"superinstructions" like this for free, without needing to dedicate
special byte codes to them.

Tom