[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Extra info about 109170
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Extra info about 109170 |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Jul 2012 11:15:38 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 03:04:55 -0400
> Cc: Emacs development discussions <address@hidden>
>
> > 28.95% emacs emacs [.] mark_object
> > 15.03% emacs emacs [.] exec_byte_code
> > 11.77% emacs emacs [.] Fkill_buffer ! OUCH !
>
> Surprising, indeed!
> Tho I guess it's due to with-temp-buffer and things like that.
> Thanks,
I'd appreciate if someone could explain why are we excited about 8%
speedup, and on top of that in massive byte-compiling (something that
can hardly be described as a frequent operation). To me, it sounds
like a classic case of premature optimization: speeding up something
that takes 12% of the total time. Maybe I'm missing something.
- Extra info about 109170, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/07/20
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/21
- Re: Extra info about 109170,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/22
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/07/22
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/23
- Re: Extra info about 109170, joakim, 2012/07/23
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Nix, 2012/07/23
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/07/23
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/23
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/07/24
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/24
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/07/24