[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC, experimental] save_{excursion,restriction}
From: |
Dmitry Antipov |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC, experimental] save_{excursion,restriction} |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:38:58 +0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 |
On 07/25/2012 02:05 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
I think you'll be better off making it into a standard Lisp_Object such
as pseudovector or a Lisp_Misc. The fact that they're only used on the
specpdl and hence managed via xmalloc+xfree shouldn't make them
that special.
OK. The only question is: should `excursion' field of struct buffer
be special, like `undo_list', or handled as usual? This patch assumes
first scenario, but it's not a problem to follow the second one.
Dmitry
excursion_5.patch
Description: Text document
- [RFC, experimental] save_{excursion,restriction}, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/07/23
- Re: [RFC, experimental] save_{excursion,restriction}, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/23
- Re: [RFC, experimental] save_{excursion,restriction}, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/07/24
- Re: [RFC, experimental] save_{excursion,restriction}, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/24
- Re: [RFC, experimental] save_{excursion,restriction}, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/07/24
- Re: [RFC, experimental] save_{excursion,restriction}, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/24
- Re: [RFC, experimental] save_{excursion,restriction},
Dmitry Antipov <=
- Re: [RFC, experimental] save_{excursion,restriction}, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/25
- Re: [RFC, experimental] save_{excursion,restriction}, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/07/26
- Re: [RFC, experimental] save_{excursion,restriction}, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/26
Re: [RFC, experimental] save_{excursion,restriction}, Ivan Andrus, 2012/07/24
Re: [RFC, experimental] save_{excursion,restriction}, Chong Yidong, 2012/07/26