Re: Emacs Webapp/Plugin

[Lennart Borgman]

On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Miles Bader <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> My understanding was that although binary distributed by google wasn't
> free, because it includes various bells and whistles implemented with
> non-free libraries (e.g. video decoding ...?), the guts of the browser
> _is_ actually free software, and a completely free version of it
> exists ("chromium", which is in debian) which simply omits the
> non-free bells and whistles.  I've tried both, and didn't notice any
> obvious difference between them, so I'm not really sure what exactly
> the bells-and-whistles consists of...
>
> I don't know how the difference between the free and non-free versions
> affects plugins though...

http://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/ChromiumBrowserVsGoogleChrome

(What is "metrics" mentioned there?)