Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside)

[Pascal J. Bourguignon]

Aurélien Aptel <address@hidden> writes:

> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Pascal J. Bourguignon
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Why go to python, when Common Lisp has a perfectly nice reader macro
>> system to do that kind of things?
>
> This is simple a proof of concept. If someone is interested by porting
> the CL reader macro to emacs I'm also fine with it but it's a lot more
> work.

I have a CL reader, written in CL.  One could port it to emacs-24 easily
enough I'd say.  It's AGPL3, I wouldn't mind assigning the copyright of
a derived work of it to the FSF for inclusion in emacs.


> I've made a little article on the Emacs Lisp reader while I was doing
> this. It's available here:
> http://definitelyaplug.b0.cx/post/A-look-at-Emacs-Lisp-reader

Thanks.
-- 
__Pascal Bourguignon__                     http://www.informatimago.com/
A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}.