[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside)
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside) |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Aug 2012 09:29:49 +0900 |
Dmitri Paduchikh writes:
> I like the Lua way of solving this problem.
So write a Lua-macs. This is not a good idea for mainline Emacs, for
backward compatibility reasons.
> They use different characters for string and regexp escaping (\ and
> % correspondingly).
Definitely % is inappropriate, since it's used for string formatting,
and I've seen many applications of regexps that use regexps built with
`format'. Talk about huge opportunities for confusion!
- Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside), (continued)
- Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside), Vr Rm, 2012/08/09
- Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/08/10
- Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside), Stefan Monnier, 2012/08/10
- Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/08/10
- Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside), Stefan Monnier, 2012/08/10
- Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/08/11
- Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside), Dmitri Paduchikh, 2012/08/11
- Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside),
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside), Vr Rm, 2012/08/10
- Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside), Davis Herring, 2012/08/10
- Learning Emacs regexp (was: Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside)), chad, 2012/08/10
- Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/08/11
Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside), Dmitry Gutov, 2012/08/10