[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: inlinable functions instead of macros
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: inlinable functions instead of macros |
|
Date: |
Sun, 19 Aug 2012 05:45:31 +0300 |
> Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 14:31:13 -0700
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden
>
> On 08/18/2012 02:03 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > What do __FUNCTION__ and __func__ hold for an inlined function?
>
> The name of the inlined function itself, which is not what's
> wanted here.
Sounds like this could be a starting point for a GCC feature that is
wanted here.
Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Richard Stallman, 2012/08/18
Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/08/18
Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Florian Weimer, 2012/08/19
Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Sam Steingold, 2012/08/20