Re: Reachable killed buffers

[martin rudalics]

> Right, but as I understand it in the meantime it would still exist as
> a dead buffer, and would continue to pressure the GC.  And it might
> inadvertently survive the next sweep too, no?

Yes.  But a user could have a reference right to the dead buffer which
is much more likely than a reference to an object of a window's previous
or next buffers.

> The goal is to reclaim
> all the dead buffers, not just some of them.

Unless they have strong pointers.  The ones from the windows are weak.

martin