[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Defaults for elisp-mode files
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: Defaults for elisp-mode files |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Oct 2012 11:22:41 -0700 |
>I'm seeing more and more Elisp files with "-*- lexical-binding: t;
>
> I think in the longer term these annotations should be made
> unnecessary because they're ugly. Any suggestion would be welcome.
Suggestion: Don't do it. Let them be (ugly).
Instead, please fix bugs introduced by changing to lexical binding without
sufficient care.
Bug (regression) #12232, for instance, introduced back in May and which has
received no response. ("Lisp nesting exceeds `max-lisp-eval-depth'")
- Defaults for elisp-mode files, Stefan Monnier, 2012/10/03
- RE: Defaults for elisp-mode files,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: Defaults for elisp-mode files, Christopher Schmidt, 2012/10/03
- Re: Defaults for elisp-mode files, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/10/03
- Defaults for elisp-mode files, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/10/03
- Re: Defaults for elisp-mode files, Stefan Monnier, 2012/10/03
- Re: Defaults for elisp-mode files, Christopher Monsanto, 2012/10/03
- Re: Defaults for elisp-mode files, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/10/04
- Re: Defaults for elisp-mode files, Christopher Monsanto, 2012/10/04
- Re: Defaults for elisp-mode files, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/10/04
- Re: Defaults for elisp-mode files, Andreas Schwab, 2012/10/04
- Re: Defaults for elisp-mode files, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/10/04