Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: Ken Brown <address@hidden>,  address@hidden,  address@hidden
> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:04:38 -0400
> 
> > This just means NSTATIC should be bumped up again (which Daniel
> > already did, I see).
> 
> > I think going from 0x650 to 0x1000 is too much.  But I'll let Stefan
> > decide.
> 
> I'm not too worried about those 20KB, but yes, 0x800 sounds like
> a better choice.

Done.