[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal to improve the nomenclature of scrolling directions
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: Proposal to improve the nomenclature of scrolling directions |
Date: |
Tue, 06 Nov 2012 10:25:49 +0900 |
Nix writes:
> (Even on mobile devices with touchscreens, where you swipe the text
> to move the text up, that operation is *still* called 'scrolling
> down'.)
Which drives me nuts, because it's the text that moves (and that's
true in editors, as well). For me it's "page down" but "scroll the
text up". "Scroll [nothing in particular but Do What I Mean dammit]
<direction>" is just uninterpretable to me. ;-)
I don't really care if you invert the names in Emacs, but I would
prefer using a verb other than "scroll" that strongly implies moving
the viewport (eg, "page") over a given buffer. I have less problems
with paging fractionally (eg, measured in lines) than with scrolling
viewports (reminds me of the door in Howell's Moving Castle, or if you
want a less fantastical illustration, the new paging look in Mac
Finder or Safari on an iPhone where the content changes as the
viewport scrolls).
From-the-Rick-Moen-Dept:but-maybe-that's-just-me-ly y'rs,
Re: Proposal to improve the nomenclature of scrolling directions, Richard Stallman, 2012/11/05
Re: Proposal to improve the nomenclature of scrolling directions, Daniel Hackney, 2012/11/05