Re: CEDET non-regression bug fixes

[David Engster]

Stefan Monnier writes:
>> At this stage, there must be a *Completions* buffer, otherwise it's an
>> error anyway. But regarding the freeze, I will wrap something around
>> that making sure it exists.
>
> I'd rather keep this for trunk:
> - it's not safe.
> - It's not a regression.
> - It's not even a bug fix: it improves behavior more than it fixes a bug.

OK.

>>> We need to do something to avoid those problems.  AFAIK there's no
>>> reason to ever prefer get-file-buffer over find-buffer-visiting, so
>>> maybe we should simply get rid of get-file-buffer and make it an alias
>>> of find-buffer-visiting.
>> Oh, you have my vote for that.
>
> Great!  How much (time and effort) are you willing to contribute to
> my campaign?

Can't I just give you money?

Anyway, do you plan on actually replacing all `get-file-buffer's? That
would have to wait for the release anyway, I guess.

-David