[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Zombie subprocesses
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Zombie subprocesses |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Nov 2012 10:46:18 +0200 |
> Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 00:26:36 -0800
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> Cc: Harald Hanche-Olsen <address@hidden>, address@hidden
>
> I've also been able to reproduce the bug. Fixing this
> is nontrivial, unfortunately, so I've removed the
> patch from the emacs-24 branch (in bzr 110950).
>
> I will look into it further as soon as I can, and will
> follow up at Bug#8855. I expect that any fix will
> require further shakeout so it seems more appropriate
> for the trunk than for the emacs-24 branch. Sorry.
Is leaving zombie processes here and there really worse than the
conflict with GTK-launched subprocesses? Maybe I'm missing something,
but it sounds to me the other way around. So IMO we should leave the
backported changes on the emacs-24 branch, even if it is eventually
decided not to fix the zombie problem, due to complexities of that
fix.
- Zombie subprocesses, Harald Hanche-Olsen, 2012/11/23
- Re: Zombie subprocesses, Paul Eggert, 2012/11/23
- Re: Zombie subprocesses, Ken Brown, 2012/11/23
- Re: Zombie subprocesses, Chong Yidong, 2012/11/24
- Re: Zombie subprocesses, Paul Eggert, 2012/11/24
- Re: Zombie subprocesses, Harald Hanche-Olsen, 2012/11/24
- Re: Zombie subprocesses, Paul Eggert, 2012/11/26
Re: Zombie subprocesses, James Cloos, 2012/11/24