[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: clang/emacs/ecb/semantic
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: clang/emacs/ecb/semantic |
Date: |
Sat, 01 Dec 2012 14:30:49 -0500 |
> Do you mean, the entire parse tree in full detail?
> Would it be conceivable to feed this into a nonfree back-end?
> Would this mean that nonfree backends could take advantage
> of our free front-ends?
No. The output does not contain the actual body of functions, for
instance. It is useful for knowing "what's the type of this global
variable?", "where is this type defined?", "how many arguments has
this function? what's their types?", "what's the data members of this
struct?", "what's the methods of this class?" etc
In that case, it seems like a fine feature as far as I can see.
I will ask the GCC developers about it.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call
- Re: clang/emacs/ecb/semantic,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: clang/emacs/ecb/semantic, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/01
- Re: clang/emacs/ecb/semantic, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/01
- Re: clang/emacs/ecb/semantic, Daniel Colascione, 2012/12/02
- Re: clang/emacs/ecb/semantic, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/02
- Re: clang/emacs/ecb/semantic, Daniel Colascione, 2012/12/02
- Re: clang/emacs/ecb/semantic, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/12/03
- Re: clang/emacs/ecb/semantic, Chong Yidong, 2012/12/03
- Re: clang/emacs/ecb/semantic, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/12/03
- Re: clang/emacs/ecb/semantic, Daniel Colascione, 2012/12/03
- Re: clang/emacs/ecb/semantic, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/12/03