[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?
From: |
Glenn Morris |
Subject: |
Re: Dual licensing of Org manual? |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:05:38 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
It's possible that the GNU position may have softened wrt invariant
sections and cover texts. GFDL with no invariant sections and no cover
texts is acceptable for Debian "free" IIUC.
http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/License-Notices-for-Documentation.html
If your manual is not published by the FSF, and under 400 pages, you
can omit both cover texts.
The Org manual is under 400 pages, but at ~ 250 pages it is pretty
substantial. I do not know if it is published.
Anyway, you need rms to answer this. If he doesn't respond anyway within
a week or so then ask him directly about the invariant sections and
cover texts if you want to.
- Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/13
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Glenn Morris, 2012/12/13
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/13
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/14
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/12/14
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/14
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/14
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/15
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/15
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/16
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bill Wohler, 2012/12/19