[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: Dual licensing of Org manual? |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:04:29 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Richard,
I changed the copyright notice of the Org manual to this:
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or
any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no
Invariant Sections and no Cover Texts.
Glenn Morris <address@hidden> writes:
> http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/License-Notices-for-Documentation.html
If I read the webpage above correctly, I assume it is fine to not have
cover texts because (1) the manual is not published by the FSF and (2)
the manual is less than 400 pages.
Let me know if you disagree and if I should update the copyright licence
again.
--
Bastien
- Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/13
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Glenn Morris, 2012/12/13
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/13
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?,
Bastien <=
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/12/14
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/14
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/14
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/15
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/15
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/16
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bill Wohler, 2012/12/19
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/19
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/20
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bill Wohler, 2012/12/20