[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: Dual licensing of Org manual? |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Dec 2012 06:43:56 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Glenn,
Glenn Morris <address@hidden> writes:
> Bastien wrote:
>
>> The notice in version 7.9.2 of the Org manual* says:
> [...]
>> A copy of the license is included in the section entitled "GNU Free
>> Documentation License."
>
> This was untrue (there was no such section). I added one.
Thanks. Also done for org.texi and orgguide.texi in our git repo.
>> This document is part of a collection distributed under the GNU Free
>> Documentation License. If you want to distribute this document
>> separately from the collection, you can do so by adding a copy of the
>> license to the document, as described in section 6 of the license.
>
> This was logially inconsistent with the above. I removed it.
Indeed, thanks.
--
Bastien
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, (continued)
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/14
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/12/14
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/14
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/14
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/15
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/15
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/16
Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/14