[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: Dual licensing of Org manual? |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:18:27 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> "If the FSF is not the author of your manual, and if your manual is
> under 400 pages, you can omit both cover texts."
>
> It should say, "If the FSF is the copyright holder, ask the FSF what
> to do." I will fix that, and also think about what to do in this case.
Thanks!
--
Bastien
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, (continued)
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/13
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/14
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/12/14
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/14
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/14
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/15
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/15
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?,
Bastien <=
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bill Wohler, 2012/12/19
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/19
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/20
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bill Wohler, 2012/12/20
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/20
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/21
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/20
Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/14