[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r111349: * lisp/progmodes/cperl-mode.el (cperl-
|
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
|
Subject: |
Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r111349: * lisp/progmodes/cperl-mode.el (cperl-calculate-indent): Do not stagger |
|
Date: |
Fri, 28 Dec 2012 15:49:58 +0900 |
Xue Fuqiao writes:
> On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:49:47 +0900
> "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > Are those strings valid syntax for referencing bzr revisions (eg in
> > log or checkout)?
>
> for log:
> % bzr log -r 1000.. # Revision 1000 and everything after it
Read "bzr help revisionspec". revno:1 is mentioned, revno#1 is not.
That's why I asked.
> And `bzr checkout' is seldom used.
Actually, I do "$VCS checkout/update -r $REVSPEC" a lot in projects
where review takes place after the commit. That's precisely why I
would want valid syntax in log messages.