[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Package signing infrastructure suggestion (was Re: ELPA security)
From: |
Xue Fuqiao |
Subject: |
Re: Package signing infrastructure suggestion (was Re: ELPA security) |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Jan 2013 07:01:51 +0800 |
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:32:24 -0500
Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> wrote:
> I think for the ELPA it makes sense to strenghen that integration in
> order to achieve package verification and other useful features, like
> retrieving a specific verision of the ELPA repository or mirroring an
> ELPA repository easily.
I think so, too. Integrate the security with DVCS is a good choice.
--
Best regards, Xue Fuqiao.
http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/XueFuqiao
Re: ELPA security, Stefan Monnier, 2012/12/22
- Re: ELPA security, Paul Nathan, 2012/12/26
- Re: ELPA security, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/12/31
- Re: ELPA security, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/12/31
- Package signing infrastructure suggestion (was Re: ELPA security), Nic Ferrier, 2012/12/31
- Re: Package signing infrastructure suggestion (was Re: ELPA security), Ted Zlatanov, 2012/12/31
- Re: Package signing infrastructure suggestion (was Re: ELPA security),
Xue Fuqiao <=
Re: ELPA security, Tom Tromey, 2012/12/31
RE: ELPA security, Drew Adams, 2012/12/31
Re: ELPA security, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/12/31
Re: ELPA security, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/12/31