[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ELPA security
From: |
Jambunathan K |
Subject: |
Re: ELPA security |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Jan 2013 11:17:36 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
If GNU packages come with no warranty of any sort, I am wondering why
all this fuzz.
If I am downloading a package from a trustworthy site - "certified" by a
legal entity - I should be doing good, right.
I have never even thought of verifying my Emacs, ever. If Emacs,
happened to carry a virus or if the rumour-mills go abuzzing about virus
infiltration or if AV packages go bonkers, I may become extra paranoid.
Also, when I am downloading stuff from a distributor I implicitly trust
shouldn't I be doing good. Can I not rely on the distributor to do the
due diligence?
Again, I am going to be fired from multiple quarters for posting this.
That's fine. I am willing to face the cannon and hopefully others will
be informed or warned.
ps: I have nothing against elaborate security measures and VVIP gate
passes. Question is does my house really need it?
--
- Re: ELPA security, Achim Gratz, 2013/01/05
- Re: ELPA security, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/01/06
- Re: ELPA security, Paul Nathan, 2013/01/07
- Re: ELPA security,
Jambunathan K <=
- Re: ELPA security, Paul Nathan, 2013/01/07
- Re: ELPA security, Jambunathan K, 2013/01/07
- Re: ELPA security, Paul Nathan, 2013/01/07
- Re: ELPA security, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/01/07
- Re: ELPA security, chad, 2013/01/07
- Re: ELPA security, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/01/07
- Re: ELPA security, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/01/07
- Re: ELPA security, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/01/07
- Re: ELPA security, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/01/07
- Re: ELPA security, Stefan Monnier, 2013/01/07