Re: Repairing the elpa branch

[Stefan Monnier]

>> I think capturing those merges is important.
>> subsequent syncs with upstream are made more difficult if you use flat
>> commits.
> I think it is a matter of picking the lesser of two evils.  Not being
> able to check out the branch at all (without a non-obvious workaround)
> seems to be much worse problem, compared with a bit of difficulty
> syncing with upstream.  Since no one else has come up with a better
> solution, maybe we should go with Glenn's.

Another direction (which I think is preferable/needed in the longer
term) is to better support "one branch per ELPA package".


        Stefan