[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Better indentation for elisp
From: |
Sergey Mozgovoy |
Subject: |
Re: Better indentation for elisp |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:23:41 -0800 (PST) |
Thierry Volpiatto-2 wrote
> See:
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/155910/match=lisp+indent+function
Thank you for response and the link.
I guess you're sure that Emacs Lisp indentation is not so bad as to be
worth the effort of introducing substantial changes. OK, I agree
that's probably my own censoriousness which bothers me, rather than
Elisp indentation. :)
However, please do note that aside from *flet*, there were some other
examples. I guess they don't annoy pretty much anyone except for me,
too.
Actually, what struck me the most was the indentation of constructs
like this:
*
(let-like-macro (a 10
b 20
c 30)
... BODY ...)
*
Well, this is actually a let-like construct, but bindings are not
explicitly taken into additional parenthesis. They are "unrolled".
What I would want here is /flat/ indentation, but present Elisp
indenting algorithm treats the binding list as a normal function call.
Yeah, I agree that the easiest way to handle this would be to just
give up and live with default indentation, or use some more
conventional syntactic constructs.
--
View this message in context:
http://emacs.1067599.n5.nabble.com/Better-indentation-for-elisp-tp278668p278696.html
Sent from the Emacs - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Better indentation for elisp, Didier Verna, 2013/02/21