Re: Copyright/Distribution questions (Emacs/Orgmode)

[Andreas Röhler]

Am 15.03.2013 01:42, schrieb Stephen J. Turnbull:
> Richard Stallman writes:
>   >     Ad hominem, Richard?  That's usually beneath you.
>   >
>   > It is not an ad-hominem attack, it is criticism of what you are
>   > saying.
>
> You dismissed the content of what I wrote, citing not the content, but
> an attribution of intent to me.  That is, without doubt, argumentum ad
> hominem.
>
> Your attribution was also false.  I am genuinely concerned that the
> FSF and I disagree over the scope of my assignments.

Hi Stephen,

sounds good and justified.

BTW can you remember a case, where the claimed purpose of the assignment came 
into action?
I.e. did FSF act at US-courts based on it's Emacs copyright ownership?

Also: why is the famous assigment text hardly visible in the net throughout 
years?

Best,

Andreas


  I don't know if
> it matters enough to me to do something about it -- I'll have to think
> about that -- but I was shocked by the breadth of the claim that you
> seemed to be making.