[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs-devel Digest, Vol 109, Issue 57
From: |
d.henman |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs-devel Digest, Vol 109, Issue 57 |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Mar 2013 00:20:33 +1000 |
Mr. Stallman's statement was factual and accurately described the messages'
function. It was by no means an attack on ones character, or lack thereof.
That has already been made known, by yourself. I must admit that your
messages, being melodramatic a
nd the use of silly phraseology is kind of funny, but, alas, it doesn't belong
on this list. I invite you to withdraw your pleasure in this developement
forum.
Cheers,
address@hidden wrote:
> From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden>
>
> You dismissed the content of what I wrote, citing not the content, but
> an attribution of intent to me. That is, without doubt, argumentum ad
> hominem.
>
> Your attribution was also false. I am genuinely concerned that the
> FSF and I disagree over the scope of my assignments. I don't know if
> it matters enough to me to do something about it -- I'll have to think
> about that -- but I was shocked by the breadth of the claim that you
> seemed to be making.
b
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Emacs-devel Digest, Vol 109, Issue 57,
d.henman <=