[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (0 <= i && i < N) is not "backwards"
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: (0 <= i && i < N) is not "backwards" |
|
Date: |
Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:09:35 +0200 |
> From: Noah Lavine <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:58:28 -0400
> Cc: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>, Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>,
> Emacs development discussions <address@hidden>
>
> To continue a tangent, if adding an explicit isnan() makes the code run any
> slower, I think you should file a bug with GCC to get that fixed.
I don't think GCC is a problem: isnan is a builtin function there, so
even a function call overhead is spared.
Re: (0 <= i && i < N) is not "backwards", Jim Meyering, 2013/03/30