Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r112148: Added eshell-tramp module

[Stefan Monnier]

>> This said, IIUC just loading eshell-tramp.el will also enable it (tho
>> not "completely").  That's a problem (and yes, this is not a new
>> problem, it's just a problem in most/all eshell modules).
> Yes, if the feature `em-tramp' is loaded but the module is not enabled,
> then it is just taking up memory and doing nothing.

Just taking up memory is not a problem.  But IIUC since it defines
eshell/su, it will have an impact on eshell buffers, even if
eshell-tramp-initialize is not called, right?


        Stefan