[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development
From: |
Barry Warsaw |
Subject: |
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Apr 2013 20:26:13 -0400 |
On Mar 27, 2013, at 01:15 PM, Richard Stallman wrote:
>The point is, I am trying to determine whether Bzr is effectively
>maintained or not. I'd rather get a Yes answer than a No answer.
Given that Bazaar is GPL v2 and the contributor agreement is not that onerous
IMHO (e.g. you retain copyright to your contributed changes), what's stopping
the user community from stepping up to help to maintain it, just like any
other free software?
If it's lack of interest, then okay, that happens with projects all the time.
If it's something else, then please identify, as it may be possible to fix
organizational or other issues to make it easier for folks to contribute to
the project and move it along, regardless of Canonical's sponsorship.
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, (continued)
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Xue Fuqiao, 2013/04/07
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen Leake, 2013/04/04
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Daniel Colascione, 2013/04/04
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/04/04
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Wojciech Meyer, 2013/04/06
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Julien Danjou, 2013/04/05
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Karl Fogel, 2013/04/05
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/05
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Lennart Borgman, 2013/04/05
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2013/04/02
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development,
Barry Warsaw <=
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/04/01
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, chad, 2013/04/02
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/02
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, chad, 2013/04/02
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/02
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, chad, 2013/04/02
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Jose E. Marchesi, 2013/04/02
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Barry Warsaw, 2013/04/02
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Jay Belanger, 2013/04/02
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Karl Fogel, 2013/04/02