Re: Naming internal functions

[Stefan Monnier]

>> I'd be happy to refine/extend/tweak the existing conventions, but
>> switching to different ones would be a lot more problematic.
> I would like to propose a tweak to the prefix convention.
>     (info "(elisp)Coding Conventions")
> Let's separate package and name of internal functions or variables with
> two consecutive dashes.

Sounds good, tho a suggested patch would be welcome.

> There are some packages which implement that already, such as epg or cl.

Indeed I like to use this convention.


        Stefan