Re: recursive edit in ispell sessions

[Michael Heerdegen]

Hi,

made it a bug report now - bug#14192.

Michael Heerdegen <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi,
>
> I think the most common use of entering a recursive edit in an ispell
> session (C-r) would be to modify the checked buffer - especially, to
> substitute the currently checked word with some other text.  But
> whenever I exit the recursive edit (C-M-c), the deleted text reappears
> and is highlighted again as unknown Try it with emacs -Q!
>
> My question: can we improve that?  If this most simple case - replacing
> the current word - is not possible, we shouldn't IMHO advertise C-r in
> `ispell-help' etc.  Or did I miss something?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Michael.