Re: fix for bug 10994 breaks ido customizations in major way

[Leo Liu]

On 2013-05-09 04:56 +0800, Juri Linkov wrote:
> Since you intended to make `delete-consecutive-dups' destructive,
> wouldn't it be more efficient to use `setcdr' like in `delete-dups'?
>
> Then it could be also used for a new possible value of the option
> `history-delete-duplicates' to delete consecutive elements from the history.

Yes for efficiency it could destructively modify the list in-place. ido
needs non-destructive so I am keeping it as ido-remove-consecutive-dups
for now.

Leo