Re: DBus events processing

[Michael Albinus]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

> So we should change the C code for our dbus interface.  It could either
> be shoehorned into the way process filters/sentinels are handled, or we
> could add a secondary event queue for "asynchronous events".

Gimme some days, I'll try to understand how it works with process events.

However, I don't know whether such a change would solve Julien's problem.

>         Stefan

Best regards, Michael.