|
From: | Stefan Monnier |
Subject: | Re: GnuTLS updates proposal |
Date: | Fri, 24 May 2013 21:52:14 -0400 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
> I am proposing that GnuTLS updates should be pushed out this way (which > would also cover installation, so the user doesn't have to get it from a > ZIP file on W32 or from God knows where on Mac OS X... Homebrew or Fink > or something else) instead of putting that responsibility on the user. That sounds OK so far. > We could use the GNU ELPA as the transport (once it has package > signing). I can be responsible for following the GnuTLS announcements. Now I lost you. How did we go from "gnutls" to "we"? Shouldn't some gnutls guys take care of that? Stefan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |