[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Using glib's g_file_monitor_file and g_file_monitor_directory
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: Using glib's g_file_monitor_file and g_file_monitor_directory |
Date: |
Tue, 28 May 2013 07:44:57 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 |
On 05/28/2013 03:39 AM, Michael Albinus wrote:
> Comments on the patch are welcome. And we should also start to design an
> upper layer over gfilenotify.c, inotify.c and w32notify.c, which
> abstracts from the respective file notification events
I've been running into a similar issue with monitoring
child processes; see Bug#14474. A couple of dumb questions:
Should the issues of file-change and process-change notifications
be combined, or kept separate?
Would it make sense, at the low level, for Emacs to rely on the
glib primitives in child-process area? I worry about race
conditions (SIGCHLD arriving in the middle of memory allocation,
that sort of thing).
- Re: Using glib's g_file_monitor_file and g_file_monitor_directory, Michael Albinus, 2013/05/28
- Re: Using glib's g_file_monitor_file and g_file_monitor_directory,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: Using glib's g_file_monitor_file and g_file_monitor_directory, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/28
- Re: Using glib's g_file_monitor_file and g_file_monitor_directory, Michael Albinus, 2013/05/29
- Re: Using glib's g_file_monitor_file and g_file_monitor_directory, Stefan Monnier, 2013/05/29
- Re: Using glib's g_file_monitor_file and g_file_monitor_directory, Michael Albinus, 2013/05/29
- Re: Using glib's g_file_monitor_file and g_file_monitor_directory, Stefan Monnier, 2013/05/29
- Re: Using glib's g_file_monitor_file and g_file_monitor_directory, Michael Albinus, 2013/05/30