[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: windows build failure
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: windows build failure |
Date: |
Wed, 29 May 2013 20:17:00 +0300 |
> From: Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 17:50:02 +0200
>
> Two days ago I tried the autotools-based build method with a fresh MSYS
> install + MinGW-w64 4.7.2 (32 bits) and it complained with redefinitions
> of some time-related functions. Then tried with MinGW's gcc 4.6.? and it
> worked fine.
Please always report any such problems. Otherwise, we stand no chance
of cleaning up the MSYS build with all the available toolchains.
> Maybe TDM is using the MinGW-w64 headers?
Maybe. But the problem reported here was not with time functions, it
was with 'restrict' keyword that somehow is not interpreted as a
keyword.
> BTW, I had to install msys-coreutils-ext package with mingw-get for
> avoiding hundreds of messages about non-existing chown executable while
> on `make install'.
Yes, all the MSYS packages on the "Base" page should be installed in
full, to have a fully functional MSYS installation.
> Apart from that and ignoring the big fat MSYS dependency, using the
> autotools build on Windows was smooth enough. Thank you.
Thanks for trying it.
- windows build failure, Sean Sieger, 2013/05/26
- Re: windows build failure, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/27
- windows build failure, Sean Sieger, 2013/05/28
- Re: windows build failure, Paul Eggert, 2013/05/29
- Re: windows build failure, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/29
- Re: windows build failure, Paul Eggert, 2013/05/29
- Re: windows build failure, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/29
- Re: windows build failure, Paul Eggert, 2013/05/29
- Re: windows build failure, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/29
- Re: windows build failure, rzl24ozi, 2013/05/29
- Re: windows build failure, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/30
- Re: windows build failure, rzl24ozi, 2013/05/30
- Re: windows build failure, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/31