[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Interface of prog-prettification
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Interface of prog-prettification |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Jun 2013 11:58:48 +0200 |
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> wrote:
> The original `perl-mode' implementation of the above said that.
Well, I haven't tried having a non-ASCII keyword and prettifying it,
but I would be very surprised if it didn't work.
> I think (as already suggested here) that an arbitrary string
> should also be supported.
Yes.
> The user is not supposed to extend it. I had that originally IIRC but
> for simplicity we decided to make it one setting for all prog-modes.
> The assumption is that if you like to prettify lambdas as symbols, you
> won't mind it everywhere.
That's a strange assumption for an Emacs feature ;-)
> Maybe a mode load hook call to `prog-prettify-install'? I think
> complicating the defcustom might be less user-friendly. Suggestions
> welcome.
Do you mean a hook run from prog-prettify-install? Yes, that would work.
As for defcustom, agreed.
> Right. I think these complications, especially the inheritance aspect,
> indicate it's better to let the user decide in the load hook than to try
> to provide it in a more complicated data structure.
Yes. Though having these variables as user options (not necessarily
defcustoms, but at the very least non-internal) would be nice.
Thanks,
J
- Interface of prog-prettification, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/06/15
- Re: Interface of prog-prettification, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/06/16
- Re: Interface of prog-prettification, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/06/16
- Re: Interface of prog-prettification, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/06/17
- Re: Interface of prog-prettification, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/17
- Re: Interface of prog-prettification, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/06/17
- Re: Interface of prog-prettification, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/17
- Re: Interface of prog-prettification, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/06/17