[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Interface of prog-prettification
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Interface of prog-prettification |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jun 2013 01:46:42 +0200 |
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Stefan Monnier
<address@hidden> wrote:
> There is no interface for it.
Fair enough, though the docstring of prog-prettify-symbols suggests otherwise:
"Whether symbols should be prettified.
When set to an alist in the form `((STRING . CHARACTER)...)' it
will augment the mode's native prettify alist."
> Oh, I hadn't noticed you made prog-prettify-symbols into a defcustom.
> I think that's a mistake.
Agreed about defcustom, but allowing the user to extend it seems useful.
J
- Interface of prog-prettification, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/06/15
- Re: Interface of prog-prettification, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/06/16
- Re: Interface of prog-prettification,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: Interface of prog-prettification, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/06/17
- Re: Interface of prog-prettification, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/17
- Re: Interface of prog-prettification, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/06/17
- Re: Interface of prog-prettification, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/17
- Re: Interface of prog-prettification, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/06/17
- Re: Interface of prog-prettification, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/17
- Re: Interface of prog-prettification, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/06/17
- Re: Interface of prog-prettification, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/06/18
- Re: Interface of prog-prettification, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/18
- Re: Interface of prog-prettification, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/06/18