[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Inhibiting read-only
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Inhibiting read-only |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:10:41 +0200 |
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Jambunathan K <address@hidden> wrote:
> inhibit-read-only can be a list.
Yes, but if I'm reading correctly the documentation
-- Variable: inhibit-read-only
If this variable is non-`nil', then read-only buffers and,
depending on the actual value, some or all read-only characters
may be modified. Read-only characters in a buffer are those that
have a non-`nil' `read-only' text property. *Note Special
Properties::, for more information about text properties.
setting it to a list (or any non-nil value) will also have the effect
of allowing writting in read-only-buffers.
J
- Inhibiting read-only, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/19
- Re: Inhibiting read-only, Jambunathan K, 2013/06/19
- Re: Inhibiting read-only,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: Inhibiting read-only, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/06/19
- Re: Inhibiting read-only, Jambunathan K, 2013/06/19
- Re: Inhibiting read-only, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/06/19
- Re: Inhibiting read-only, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/19
- Re: Inhibiting read-only, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/06/19
- Re: Inhibiting read-only, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/19
- Re: Inhibiting read-only, Jambunathan K, 2013/06/19