[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sweeter Emacs Lisp
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Sweeter Emacs Lisp |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:42:44 +0200 |
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> wrote:
> There is nothing wrong with using the macros from cl-lib.
I wasn't talking about the macros, but the sequence functions from
cl-seq. They are one of the most useful parts of cl-lib.
> Only when compiling.
No. These 15 files, plus emacs-lisp/cl-*.el, do require cl-lib at
runtime. There are > 100 packages that require cl-lib when compiling.
Juanma
Re: Sweeter Emacs Lisp, Andreas Schwab, 2013/07/14
Re: Sweeter Emacs Lisp, Miles Bader, 2013/07/15
- Re: Sweeter Emacs Lisp, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/07/16
- Re: Sweeter Emacs Lisp, Stefan Monnier, 2013/07/16
- Re: Sweeter Emacs Lisp, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/07/16
- Re: Sweeter Emacs Lisp, Andreas Schwab, 2013/07/16
- Re: Sweeter Emacs Lisp, Thierry Volpiatto, 2013/07/16
- Re: Sweeter Emacs Lisp,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: Sweeter Emacs Lisp, Andreas Schwab, 2013/07/16
- Re: Sweeter Emacs Lisp, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/07/16
Re: Sweeter Emacs Lisp, Stefan Monnier, 2013/07/16
Re: Sweeter Emacs Lisp, Stefan Monnier, 2013/07/22