Re: Blink cursor changes, possible W32 breakage.

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 18:42:12 -0400
> 
> >> AFAICT, most timers are already pretty friendly: all idle-timers are
> >> friendly, so only the repeated non-idle timers are problematic.
> > So you are saying that just turning off blink-cursor is good enough?
> 
> I'm just saying that it's important to avoid constantly blinking the
> cursor because it's the number 1 timer firing in an idle Emacs.

If it's not the _only_ timer we care about, its being no. 1 is
immaterial, because we need a solution for the rest as well.