Re: Blink cursor changes, possible W32 breakage.

[martin rudalics]

> ... they're not activated unless the user asks for
> it explicitly.

`jit-lock-context-timer' is activated here though I never asked for it
"explicitly".

> Also jit-lock-stealth used to be enabled by default but
> was disabled because too many people found it problematic, so only those
> people who don't care about high/excessive background CPU usage will
> have it enabled.

I'm too silly to understand: Don't we talk about the case where Emacs
remains idle?  Shouldn't these timers trigger once only after that
happened?

martin