[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: frame size&position woes
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: frame size&position woes |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Jul 2013 17:58:36 +0200 |
> Yep. But meanwhile, what we have is a mishmash of metrics, options,
> units and whatnot.
And absolutely crazy behavior like this:
emacs -Q
M-x ielm <RET>
ELISP> (setq *f* (make-frame '((width . 20) (height . 40))))
#<frame address@hidden 04e57a28>
ELISP> (defun testf (lines)
(set-frame-parameter *f* 'menu-bar-lines lines)
(cons (frame-height *f*)
(frame-pixel-height *f*)))
testf
ELISP> (testf 0)
(40 . 650)
ELISP> (testf 1)
(40 . 640)
ELISP> (testf 0)
(37 . 602)
ELISP> (testf 1)
(37 . 592)
ELISP> (testf 0)
(34 . 554)
ELISP> (testf 1)
(34 . 544)
ELISP> (testf 0)
(31 . 506)
ELISP> (testf 1)
(31 . 496)
- frame size&position woes, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/07/21
- Re: frame size&position woes, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/07/21
- Re: frame size&position woes, martin rudalics, 2013/07/21
- Re: frame size&position woes, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/07/21
- Re: frame size&position woes,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: frame size&position woes, martin rudalics, 2013/07/22
- Re: frame size&position woes, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/07/22
- Re: frame size&position woes, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/07/22
- Re: frame size&position woes, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/07/22
- Re: frame size&position woes, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/07/22
- Re: frame size&position woes, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/07/23
- Re: frame size&position woes, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/07/23
- Re: frame size&position woes, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/07/24
- Re: frame size&position woes, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/07/24
- Re: frame size&position woes, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/07/24