RE: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?))

[Drew Adams]

> I think the name clash is unfortunate.  Bad self.  

;-)

> However, in practice I don't think there's any difficulty of using the
> name to mean both things, just a small overlap during discussions.

I guess I would have to agree with that.  It would proabably be workable.

That said, it would be better to change the terminology for package.el -
e.g., when we introduce CL-style "packages".