[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FFI again
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: FFI again |
Date: |
Sun, 06 Oct 2013 19:54:57 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2013 12:39:50 -0400
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> > I really don't like this idea. You either force users to have the Emacs
> > headers, Emacs import library, and a C compiler available to install a
> > package or you provide pre-compiled binaries for popular platforms and
> > create an ABI versioning nightmare.
>
> The plan would be to require headers and a C compiler.
> Precompiled libraries could be considered for the Windows platform, but
> only if we can keep the versioning nightmare in check.
I don't think the nightmare is as bad as it sounds. Windows users
already keep such nightmares in check, including with Emacs.
- FFI again, Stefan Monnier, 2013/10/05
- Re: FFI again, joakim, 2013/10/05
- Re: FFI again, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/10/06
- Re: FFI again, Stefan Monnier, 2013/10/06
- Re: FFI again, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/10/07
- Re: FFI again, Stefan Monnier, 2013/10/07
- Re: FFI again, Andy Moreton, 2013/10/07
- Re: FFI again, Stefan Monnier, 2013/10/07
- Re: FFI again, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/10/08
- Re: FFI again, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/10/07